The Oregon Employment Relations Board (ERB) has ordered the City
of
Portland to
comply with the award of Arbitrator Jane Wilkenson that found the City
lacked just cause in terminating police officer Ronald Frashour. Frashour had been dismissed for alleged excessive use of
force in connection with the fatal shooting of a citizen. Arbitrator Wilkinson,
in an award discussed
here, concluded that
Frashour had a reasonable belief that the citizen was
attempting to retrieve a gun to shoot at others. The arbitrator
concluded that the City had failed to establish a violation of its policies
concerning use of force and ordered him reinstated with back pay. Disagreeing with the arbitrator’s decision, the City’s
mayor announced that he would not implement the award. The Portland Police
Association pursued the matter before the ERB, alleging a violation of
applicable law. The
Oregon
statute makes it an unfair labor practice for a public employer “to violate the
provisions of any written contract …or to [refuse to] accept the terms of an arbitration
award…” There is an exception, however, for an award that “orders the
reinstatement of a public employee or otherwise relieves the public employee of
responsibility for misconduct” unless the award complies “with public policy
requirements as clearly defined in statutes or judicial decisions including but
not limited to policies respecting sexual harassment or sexual misconduct,
unjustified and egregious use of physical or deadly force and serious criminal
misconduct related to work.”
The City maintained that the reinstatement of Officer
Frashour fell within this exception and that his reinstatement would violate
public policy. Rejecting this
contention, the ERB found that once the arbitrator found that the officer had
not engaged in misconduct there was no basis for a claim that the officer had
been “relieved” of misconduct.
The ERB concluded:
We have been told by the courts not to
engage in a right-wrong analysis, but rather to ensure that the parties got
what they bargained for- a binding decision by an arbitrator. … Although our
deference to an arbitrator’s award is not unlimited, until such time as an
award violates public policy as outlined in ORS 243.706(1), we are bound to
uphold the award.
In this case, the arbitrator
determined that Frashour did not violate the City’s policies, and therefore did
not engage in misconduct. The City does not have a lawful reason for refusing
to implement the award.
No comments:
Post a Comment